| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Knuckles Emu-maniac

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 47
|
Post: #1 Posted: June 16, 2007, 3:46 PM Post subject: Gekko's first Public Video! |
|
|
Just to get ride once for all of those people that still think it's fake.
Here's a video I recorded last night using HyperCam (not FRAPS). In this video you will see the main emulator running, it's output console, the folder with the files in the back and th hypercam window.
NOTE1: The video speed isn't the real speed the game would be going. It's slower due to Hypercam running over it (and using some of the CPU).
NOTE2: The video is encoded in xvid. You will need this decoder installed in order to be able to watch the video.
LINK HERE
Enjoy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoraK05 Emu-maniac
Joined: 27 May 2007 Posts: 27
|
Post: #2 Posted: June 16, 2007, 6:49 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Wow! Amazing! This has made more progress than I imagined!!! I'm sure it'll be so cool when it's out!!! _________________ AMD Athlon 64 3200+
ATi Radeon x1800 XT
1.5gb RAM
250GB + 320GB Hard Disk
Enjoying the GameCube! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ExodusC Gekko Beta Tester

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 499 Location: East Coast, USA
|
Post: #3 Posted: June 16, 2007, 8:03 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Heh, now non-N'Siders can't complain that we don't give them stuff anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emwearz Gekkobot

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 120 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[SS] Starscream Gekkozoid
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 455 Location: Florida
|
Post: #5 Posted: June 17, 2007, 6:08 AM Post subject: |
|
|
I had no doubt, maybe flying blind here but i still believe and always did.
You didn't even need to give them the satisfaction of proving anything to fools.
Now that i think about it, i don't think it's real either and i might need a beta to get some peace of mind.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emwearz Gekkobot

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 120 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JKKDARK Gekkobot

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 102 Location: Munich, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Low Lines Emu-maniac

Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Australia
|
Post: #8 Posted: June 17, 2007, 9:44 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Yay Link's eyes are alien like LOL
I agree it probably wasn't needed to post an actual video because in a way that's really doing what they want isn't it?
What's so important about getting a better working Gamecube emulator out to public anyways? I bet most of these n00bs don't even realise they are breaking laws in the process :p (the ones that complain i mean)
I'm not worried :p Atm I can't even use PCSX2 so I doubt I'd be able to use Gekko either :p But it's nice to pop on every now and then to see how progress is going and stuff :p
Nice work though  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chrono Archangel Administrator

Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 471
|
Post: #9 Posted: June 18, 2007, 2:06 AM Post subject: |
|
|
| Low Lines wrote: | Yay Link's eyes are alien like LOL
|
Better than the Zorro eyes we had before :p |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Low Lines Emu-maniac

Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Australia
|
Post: #10 Posted: June 18, 2007, 6:43 AM Post subject: |
|
|
| Chrono Archangel wrote: | | Low Lines wrote: | Yay Link's eyes are alien like LOL
|
Better than the Zorro eyes we had before :p |
True
Small question of interest though, what sort of pc system was that video recorded on? I'm not a speed person or nothing, just trying to get an idea of what hardware it took to get those results? I've read previous posts and stuff about different things mentioned and stuff but yeah :p _________________ Odds and ends at: http://llref.emutalk.net (Low Lines Resources) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emwearz Gekkobot

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 120 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Low Lines Emu-maniac

Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Australia
|
Post: #12 Posted: June 19, 2007, 1:22 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| emwearz wrote: | | The video is Knuckles using his current rig which is a AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2Ghz, 7600GS 512MB and Dual Channel 1GB DDR400. For a rig like that those speeds look pretty inviting. |
Lol um, so that's a CPU 2Ghz, graphics card 512mb, and 1gb ram in basic idiot terms? _________________ Odds and ends at: http://llref.emutalk.net (Low Lines Resources) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emwearz Gekkobot

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 120 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Low Lines Emu-maniac

Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Australia
|
Post: #14 Posted: June 19, 2007, 3:18 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| emwearz wrote: | | Well you cant really say CPU 2 ghz like that basically, because a P4 @ 2.0ghz will run much slower than a AMD64 @ 2.0 yet a Core 2 Duo at 2.0ghz will run much faster than a AMD64 @ 2.0ghz, its really not as simple as saying 2.0ghz CPU (the same goes for the rest of the components). |
Sort of annoything that isn't it? Why don't they have like a generic I guess measurement scheme so u can basically sit two pieces of hardware alongside each other and know without testing them or whatever which one is better :p _________________ Odds and ends at: http://llref.emutalk.net (Low Lines Resources) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ExodusC Gekko Beta Tester

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 499 Location: East Coast, USA
|
Post: #15 Posted: June 19, 2007, 6:11 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Low Lines wrote: | | emwearz wrote: | | Well you cant really say CPU 2 ghz like that basically, because a P4 @ 2.0ghz will run much slower than a AMD64 @ 2.0 yet a Core 2 Duo at 2.0ghz will run much faster than a AMD64 @ 2.0ghz, its really not as simple as saying 2.0ghz CPU (the same goes for the rest of the components). |
Sort of annoything that isn't it? Why don't they have like a generic I guess measurement scheme so u can basically sit two pieces of hardware alongside each other and know without testing them or whatever which one is better :p |
I think the closest thing we have to a generic measurement is flops, but even then, I'm not sure how standardized that is across the board, you'd have to ask emwearz that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|